Approximate Reasoning using Linguistic Valuations
نویسنده
چکیده
The knowledge given by an expert in order to construct a Knowledge Based System is often not very precise and contains uncertainty. In general, the expert prefers to express the uncertainty in a qualitative form rather than in a quantitative on . In this paper, we present one model of the uncertainty in qualitative form. A linguistic approach in a context of a many-valued logic is proposed.We also present, all necessary tools to represent and to manage the uncertain knowledge in an Expert System. Contrary to machines, Man perfectly manages uncertain and imprecise knowledge. The following sentences are fully understandable by them: they are about 200 young persons. the temperature is very high. a very large suite. cough is quite frequent. One of the most important problems encounted during the realization of expert systems is that the knowledge representation is often chosen independently from its management. But, the representation has not any signification that allows us to know if it represents correctly or not the related knowledge. So, we have to study the doublet (use of the knowledge, use of its representation) specially when we manage uncertainty and imprecision. There are several mathematical formalisms and tools to represent such expert knowledges (probabilistic logic, default logic, fuzzy logic, etc...). We have introduced [1, 2] fundamental concepts of a many-valued logic to represent the knowledge, using linguistic valuations to translate both uncertainty and imprecision. A mechanism to manage the given knowledge in a symbolic way, avoiding computations is also proposed in [1, 2].
منابع مشابه
Generalized If ... Then ... Else Inference Rules with Linguistic Modifiers for Approximate Reasoning
In this paper, based on the our previous researchs about generalized modus ponens with linguistic modifiers for If ... Then rules, we propose generalized If...Then...Else inference rules with linguistic modifiers in linguistic many–valued logic framework with using hedge moving rules for approximate reasoning.
متن کاملApproximate Reasoning Using Logico-symbolic Valuations
The knowledge given by an expert in order to construct a Knowledge Based System is often not very precise and contains uncertainty. In many cases, the expert prefers to express the uncertainty in a qualitative form rather than in a quantitative one . In this paper, we present a model of the uncertainty (and/or the lack of precision) in qualitative form. A symbolic approach in a context of a man...
متن کاملGeneralized Modus Tollens with Linguistic Modifiers for Inverse Approximate Reasoning
Based on our previous researchs about generalized modus ponens (GMP) with linguistic modifiers for If ... Then rules, this paper proposes new generalized modus tollens (GMT) inference rules with linguistic modifiers in linguistic many–valued logic framework with using hedge moving rules for inverse approximate reasoning.
متن کاملLinguistic-Valued Approximate Reasoning With Lattice Ordered Linguistic-Valued Credibility
Linguistic terms are often used to represent the truth degree or credibility degree to manage the uncertainty or imprecision as one of popular ways of knowledge representation in the perception-based decision making problem. This present work represents the credibility of uncertain knowledge using linguistic values. The linguistic-valued credibility is then modeled based on a lattice ordered lo...
متن کاملApproximative Reasoning and Fuzzy Queries with Linguistic Quantification in Prolog Databases
– Approximate reasoning and fuzzy queries are efficient methods in retrieving information from large databases when precise attributes are unknown or the model itself is vague. We explore such types of reasoning based on the notions of the possibility theory. We suggest an approach towards a Prolog implementation of such queries which takes into account fuzzy linguistic quantification, aggregat...
متن کامل